Comparing the Book and Stage Versions of Dracula :: comparison compare contrast essays

Comparing the Book and Stage Versions of genus genus Dracula The snap was really(prenominal) enjoyable. It brought to life more of the most interesting aspects of the book. on that point were however or so diversions, that, having just read the book, were very obvious to me. However, this mending of the Dracula impudent, did non diminish my enjoyment of the play production. I was very impressed by the special effects and thoroughly enjoyed Friday nights play. It started off at the very beginning. The inauguration introduction was by Renfield. In the book, Renfield was not introduced until to a greater extent towards the center(a). Stephen Dietz, the playw upright, used a different sense of time in the play. The novel was pretty much chronological. Things happened in the order they were presented to the reader. In the play, however, there were many flashbacks. One such example, was Jonathan Harkers time at Draculas castle. This episode opens the book for us, scarcel y this was a flashback towards the middle of the play. I think that the use of time rewrite helped the plot of the play move better because Dietz could put certain events where they fitted best. He also cease the play in a different modal value a closing soliloquy by Van Helsing. This differed from the book, as it allow the audience admit time to calm down, because like the novel, the play did move up to a earlier rapid conclusion. Another difference that is noticed right away, is that Quincey Morris, and Arthur Holmwood (later Lord Godalming), ar not in the play. Dietz probably decided that withal many manly characters on the stage would just confuse the audience. It would lay down been fine, except that they (Quincey and Arthur) were both mentioned in the first act. If Dietz had just deleted those characters fully because it would not contribute been so confusing. (Note Dietz may have felt it was obligatory to mention Holmwood, because otherwise why would Lucy turn down Dr. Seward when he asked her to hook up with her. However, there was no need to mention Quincey Morris if he was not fall in of the story). Another difference between the play and novel, was that, at the very end, Dracula was finally killed (i.e. send put through his heart) by Mina. In the novel, she was disenable (not decapitated HA) and Harker and Morris killed Dracula.Comparing the Book and Stage Versions of Dracula comparison comparison contrast essays Comparing the Book and Stage Versions of Dracula The play was very enjoyable. It brought to life many of the most interesting aspects of the book. There were however some differences, that, having just read the book, were very obvious to me. However, this altering of the Dracula novel, did not diminish my enjoyment of the play production. I was very impressed by the special effects and thoroughly enjoyed Friday nights play. It started off at the very beginning. The opening introduction was by Renfield. In the boo k, Renfield was not introduced until more towards the middle. Stephen Dietz, the playwright, used a different sense of time in the play. The novel was pretty much chronological. Things happened in the order they were presented to the reader. In the play, however, there were many flashbacks. One such example, was Jonathan Harkers time at Draculas castle. This episode opens the book for us, but this was a flashback towards the middle of the play. I think that the use of time alteration helped the plot of the play move better because Dietz could put certain events where they fitted best. He also ended the play in a different manner a closing soliloquy by Van Helsing. This differed from the book, as it let the audience have time to calm down, because like the novel, the play did come to a rather rapid conclusion. Another difference that is noticed right away, is that Quincey Morris, and Arthur Holmwood (later Lord Godalming), are not in the play. Dietz probably decided that too many ma le characters on the stage would just confuse the audience. It would have been fine, except that they (Quincey and Arthur) were both mentioned in the first act. If Dietz had just deleted those characters fully then it would not have been so confusing. (Note Dietz may have felt it was necessary to mention Holmwood, because otherwise why would Lucy turn down Dr. Seward when he asked her to marry her. However, there was no need to mention Quincey Morris if he was not part of the story). Another difference between the play and novel, was that, at the very end, Dracula was finally killed (i.e. stake put through his heart) by Mina. In the novel, she was incapacitated (not decapitated HA) and Harker and Morris killed Dracula.